National Guard to Arrive in LA “Within 24 Hours”: Governor Calls Trump’s Move “Inflammatory”

In a dramatic escalation of U.S. domestic policy, President Trump has ordered the deployment of 2,000 federalized National Guard troops to Los Angeles, with commanders stating they will arrive within 24 hours to help quell protests triggered by recent ICE immigration operations.

🔥 From ICE Raids to Armed Stand-offs

The controversy ignited on June 6, when ICE conducted a series of raids in downtown L.A., the Fashion District, Paramount, and even at Home Depot sites. Video footage revealed federal agents in riot gear deploying tear gas and flash-bang grenades into tightly packed crowds. One particularly alarming image showed a vehicle set ablaze amid the chaos.

By June 7, protests had surged into a broader movement—hundreds gathered near a federal detention center chanting “ICE out of L.A.,” while law enforcement responded by declaring unlawful assembly.

🚨 A Federal Intervention Sparks Debate

Trump’s administration justified the deployment via a presidential memorandum citing a federal statute under Title 10—used to federalize the Guard, bypassing usual state approval channels. The White House described the protests as violent mobs assaulting federal agents and declared a “zero-tolerance” posture.

Governor Gavin Newsom immediately denounced the decision as “purposefully inflammatory”, warning it risks escalating tensions rather than calming them. He emphasized that L.A. law enforcement already had the resources to manage the situation, calling the move “the wrong mission” that would erode public trust.

Adding to the tension, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth hinted that active-duty Marines at Camp Pendleton were on high alert—prompting Newsom to label the prospect of deploying U.S. Marines domestically as “deranged behavior.”

🗣️ Voices from the Ground

Amid the tumult, California’s SEIU president David Huerta was injured and arrested during a demonstration—an image that drew sharp criticism from labor leaders and civil rights advocates. Meanwhile, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt maintained that Democratic leaders had “abdicated” public safety and that “violent mobs” had attacked federal agents.

💡 What’s at Stake?

This incident brings multiple fault lines into sharp relief:

• Federal vs. State Authority: Can a president unilaterally federalize the state Guard without governor approval?
• Immigration vs. Civil Liberties: Are protests over immigration enforcement protected civil actions, or do they cross into violence?
• Domestic Militarization: Does the mobilization of troops—and potentially Marines—on U.S. soil signal a dangerous precedent?

🕰️ What Happens Next?

The National Guard is expected to deploy within 24 hours, and federal prosecutors have warned that those who obstruct ICE operations could face prosecution. Meanwhile, state and city officials urge peaceful demonstration, stating local capabilities remain intact.

---

Sources:

Newsom blasts deployment of National Guard to LA as 'purposefully inflammatory' – Politico
Gavin Newsom calls threats to deploy US marines in California 'deranged' – The Guardian
What to know about Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to LA protests – AP News