🚨 Israel’s “Samson’s Choice” Threat: A Nuclear Apocalypse in the Making?
A shocking narrative has surfaced across global media: Israel may unleash a catastrophic plan called Operation Samson’s Choice if its offensive against Iran—Operation Rising Lion—fails. Popularized by Russian philosopher Alexander Dugin, this scenario outlines an apocalyptic nuclear retaliation, including targeting Iran, Yemen, and even threatening Europe if the EU recognizes Palestine.
1️⃣ What’s Really Going On?
On June 13, 2025, Israel launched an unprecedented strike on Iran, claiming to have crippled over 100 military and nuclear targets, including Fordow and Natanz. Key Iranian figures were allegedly eliminated.
2️⃣ The Source: Alexander Dugin
Dugin claims Israel is ready to trigger a nuclear chain reaction if cornered. But while his rhetoric is intense, there is no direct confirmation from official Israeli sources about this specific plan.
3️⃣ What We Do Know
- Nuclear Arsenal: Israel is estimated to possess 80–400 nuclear warheads.
- Doctrine: The "Samson Option" refers to a last-resort strategy to deter existential threats, not necessarily a suicide pact.
- Historical Actions: Past preemptive strikes on Iraq (1981) and Syria (2007) form part of the same strategic logic.
4️⃣ Debunk or De-escalate?
There is no credible evidence of a policy involving internal dirty bombs or threats to Europe. The concept is part of Israel’s deterrence mythos, not operational fact.
5️⃣ Why It Matters
Even rumors of nuclear escalation have global ripple effects:
- Oil Prices: Rose 8% after initial strikes on Iran.
- Middle East Tensions: Pakistan has vowed nuclear retaliation if Iran is attacked.
- EU Diplomacy: Recognition of Palestine may invite complex retaliatory narratives.
🔢 Final Word
Yes, Israel possesses vast nuclear capabilities, and the "Samson Option" remains part of its deterrence strategy. However, the idea of an actual operation called Samson’s Choice appears to be rooted in speculation and worst-case scenario theorizing.
The world must pursue diplomacy and restraint. A nuclear endgame benefits no one.
Comments
Post a Comment